10月14日大陆雅思大作文7分范文:破坏公物的惩罚办法,题目大意:有观点称破坏公物的人应该被判罚作义工,而非罚款或坐牢。同意反对?以下和小编一起来看看高分范文以及相关词汇和语法结构,希望对大家能够有所帮助!
高分范文示例
Some people assume that the offenders of vandalism should be sentenced to community services rather than other punishments; however, I would say it is this conviction is erroneous while ignoring contexts.
图片来源网络
Those championing the community sentences opt to venerate this penalty as a panacea to all individuals defacing public assets. From their perspective, compulsory unpaid work for local communities is most effective in rehabilitating the offenders: the services not only change their misbehaviors, but also give them an opportunity to learn to be a contributive member of society. In contrast, a fine penalty or imprisonment is considered to nothing more than a pure deterrent.
While the advantages for a social order for vandalism does seem plausible, it is generalized to assume it necessarily better than other options. Which type of penalty deserve more justification should not be judged in the abstract, but in relation to various factors in the real context, whether these be the material value of the damage or the potential repercussions on the populace. For example, if the costs of the destructed property were enormous, pure community services coupled with a fine would be more suitable option. By the same token, in case the crime posed threat to public safety, the criminals would deserve more serious punishment such as imprisonment.
From what has been discussed, it is my conclusion therefore, it is simplistic to venerate community sentences over other option in addressing vandalism, while the most effective punishing option should be discussed in contexts.
相关词汇和语法结构
vandalism 破坏公物
deface 损坏外观
panacea 灵丹妙药
rehabilitate 使(囚犯)获得改造
deterrent 遏制因素