4.10托福综合写作考题分析：减少生活成本，含参考范文！

　　4.10托福综合写作考题分析：减少生活成本，含参考范文！本文为大家带来托福写作范文，在此之前，先来点评一下4月10日托福写作：综合点评：这次托福考试综合写作部分旧题重现： 2020/11/15考题。独立写作考查生活类话题，关于减少生活成本，旧题重现：2017/12/17 和2020/8家考原题。

　　综合写作

　　考题回忆总论点阅读部分-富兰克林的风筝实验是否perform

　　听力部分-富兰克林的风筝实验存在的

图片来源网络

　　阅读部分分论点一：本杰明经常在公众面前开玩笑，比如有一次他在波士顿报纸中开玩笑说自己是女性；

　　分论点二：实验的设计是很危险的，需要有一个direct connection between the nature and the experimental settings，本杰明要是真的实施这个实验会有潜在的威胁他安全的因素；

　　分论点三：风筝实验没有其他科学家在场，唯一算的上的是他的儿子（他不是科学家）缺乏足够的说服力。

　　听力部分分论点一：本杰明是一个serious scientist。科学和journal news不同，科学更严谨。本杰明没有必要risk his reputation to make jokes。况且他之前就发表过一本关于electricity的书，这个实验只是part of his scientific effort；

　　分论点二：不需要direct connection，indirect就可以。light could spread through the cloud，只要本杰明catch这些spread的light就不会有危险；

　　分论点三：不需要witness因为这个实验没那么重要。类似的实验在之前就被法国科学家做过了，本杰明的实验只是一种另外的improvement。

　　解题思路传统四段式写作，每一段阅读内容+听力内容。

　　参考范文The reading passage is about whether Benjamin Franklin's kite experimentation can perform or not. The lecture completely refutes the reading passage. The professor uses the following points to indicate that Benjamin experiment did exist.

　　To begin with, in spite of the fact in the reading that Benjamin often cracked a joke in public, and he once in the Boston Globe said that he was a woman, the speaker suggests that Benjamin was actually a serious scientist. There were significant differences between journal news and science which was more serious, so Benjamin wouldn’t risk his reputation to make jokes, not to mention that he published a book about electricity, and the experiment was just part of his scientific effort.

　　Apart from that, the second theory of the reading indicates that Benjamin’s experiment design was so dangerous that the experiment required a direct connection between the nature and the experimental settings. If Benjamin conducted the experiment, there would be a threat to his safety. The lecturer, nevertheless, contends that the indirect connection could keep the experiment function well without direct connection. Because light could spread through the cloud, Benjamin would take no risk as long as he caught the light.

　　The third theory shows that there were no scientists during the process of the kite experimentation, which meant that the testing was not pervasive even though Benjamin’s son, not a scientist, was there. However, the lecturer points out that witnesses were not needed because similar experiments had been done by French researchers, and Benjamin’s testing was just improvement of them.