雅思7分大作文范文：教育话题常见的套路和表达都有什么？

　　雅思7分大作文范文：教育话题常见的套路和表达都有什么？今天就让我来和大家伙唠一下教育类题目。这一类题目比较常见，经常反复出现。要写好这类题目，可能就要有一个认识：

　　科学与技术是比较实用的科目 – (Science and Technology are practical subjects)

　　它们经常能帮助学生就业 -（They can usually help people to find a job）// (Students can have a better chance to get the job, if they have related academic background.)

　　提高学习（或工作）效率( Such subjects can improve students’ learning /working efficiency).

　　- 举例（example / evidence/ support your argument） 时见仁见智， 不同人有不同理解或经验， 科技对他们的意义来说就不尽相同。

　　最好也要熟悉一些常见的题目：

　　留学的好处、留学的弊端、技术在教育中的运用、技术在教育中优缺点、发展中国家的教育存在的问题及对策、家庭-学校教育优缺点的对比、体罚、男女分校、快慢班、教育的道德和社会意义等。

　　通常情况下，建议双方都考虑到。这样会更客观，能用更多专业词汇，并且降低写不够字数的风险。

　　雅思写作题目

　　Some people think government should spend more money on teaching science than in other  subjects, in order to make the country develop and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree？

　　相关题目：

　　Once children start school, teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development  than parents do. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others,  however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　文章结构：

　　第一段：交代背景，总结全文。倾向反对 – science够多了

　　第二段：More money on science 的好处（简略写一下）

　　第三段：More money on other subjects 的好处 (其它科目也很缺钱啊？)

　　第四段：More money on science  的不合理性  ( 中年失业怎么办 ?)

　　第五段：总结

图片来源网络

　　7分范文示例写作题目

　　Some people think government should spend more money on teaching science than in other subjects, in order to make the country develop and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree？

　　27分范文

　　Nowadays, many people argue that the government needs to allocate more money to science education, while I believe that it has already paid enough to attention to science subjects, and there is no need to provide more financial support for this field.

　　It cannot be denied that Science and Technology are practical subjects, which usually can help the country develop faster in a measurable way. Such subjects can usually provide more job opportunities for people, which improves the country’s economic statistics directly.  Many modern industries, such as artificial intelligence, big data and genetic research, cannot live without the improvement of science education.

　　However, I would argue that these subjects can already live on its own, and it will be more feasible for the government to invest on other subjects that need financial support more urgently, such as Education and Philosophy.  As Socrates points out, education is about the improvement of mind.  Spending more money on teaching science can only show students how to use a tool in a more professional way. However, no matter how well a person can work with the tool, if he/she cannot think logically and effectively, this person will possibly remain as a common worker for the rest of their life.  As Xun Zi, a Chinese ancient educator, believes that tools are limitless, while the way to use tools helps people to become outstanding. Allocating more money to Science cannot help people to think more properly.

　　More frighteningly, if the government encourages people to learn science, it will be possible for more people to choose such subjects, but people usually cannot predict whether the subject will be outdated or not in the future. It is not a surprise to see that some science subjects are no longer needed nowadays, such as fixing Nokia,  fixed lines or some other obsolete equipment. It seems completely legitimate to invest more on science, so that employment rate can be raised a little bit for a short term, but the government usually does not care about people’s unemployment rate after they are 35 years old. It is a more frightening fact that some countries have already spent billions of dollars on the research of chips without any actual rewards, because it is a highly risky and unpredictable field. If the governments continues spending more money on such research, it is foreseeable that they will continue wasting their money, because they do not know how to think logically and effectively. It will not be fruitful to develop science while ignoring the rest.

　　To conclude, I believe that the potential drawbacks of more investment on science subjects cannot be ignored, while it is more reasonable to invest on other subjects that are already in lack of fund.