2.28托福考试独立写作范文:工作类题材 这次托福考试写作部分整体难度适中。其中,综合写作考查生态环境类,整体难度适中,生僻词汇较少。独立写作考查工作类话题,难度适中,学生如果准备过相关工作类素材的话整体难度不大。
独立写作
话题分类工作类
考题回忆Which of the following is the best additional way for employers to know more about applicants after interviews:
1.contact their previous employers
2.search their social media
3.give them one-month probation period
解题思路写作思路:
要点:三选一的题目,可以褒一贬二,注意题目当中有限定词best,所以在论证的时候注意程度,选择一个论证好处,同时对其它两个进行反驳。
观点:认为give them one-month probation period是最好的方法
1.give them one-month probation的好处
(1)相比其它两个选择,能够提供更加真实的工作情境来检验应聘者
(2)同时提供更多的时间来测试应聘者
2. contact their previous employers的坏处
(1)之前的老板可能因为和这个员工的关系好只说好话隐瞒缺点,或者反之;
(2)有些公司规模很大,老板不大可能了解所有的员工,得到的信息不全面也不准确。
3. search their social media的坏处
(1)呈现在社交平台上的信息是不全面的,可能不能了解到工作方面的技能;
(2)也有可能是美化过的,不真实。
参考范文范文:
Hiring someone is a time-consuming process, and in order to find appropriate employees, these days many employers would also choose some additional ways to know more about applicants after interviews. My view is that while contacting the applicants’ previous employers and searching their social media seem like good options, giving them one-month probation period is the best additional method.
For newly recruited workers, one-month probation can be a trial period, which could provide more realistic working situations and offer more time to test these applicants. In most cases, the interviews could last for only few hours, so the information obtained from the interviews is not accurate and sufficient. According to a recent survey, 81% of individuals polled admitted to lying in interviews in order to get the job, while another survey from the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) found that nearly one in five employers discovered candidates had given fraudulent references. As a result, it is not possible for employers to completely know applicants until they have actually started working for them. Even if the applicants do not lie, one-month probation can also provide more time for the employers to know if their future employees have the skills and abilities they expect. Personal statement in interviews is not absolutely reliable. Instead, only real working experience can test if they can well qualified for their applied positions.
For contacting the applicants’ previous employers and searching their social media, they not only cannot provide the benefits mentioned above, but also have other problems. If the HR manager contacts the previous company, the employer probably would only tell the merits and conceal the weaknesses of the applicant only because of their good working relationship and vice versa. In some large enterprises, it is highly possible that the employer even does not know every employee, so the information gained from this way is not accurate at all. Social media, such as online profile and social platform, also cannot tell the truth. For instance, a travelling photo or a video of doing sports is only a fragment of life, so other personal abilities or work-related skills cannot be fully revealed in these media. Even worse, many people only choose not to show their own flaws on these social platforms, through which it is extremely difficult for the employers to get to know their candidates.
To sum up, after interviews, compared with contacting applicants’ previous employers and searching their social media, giving applicants one-month probation period is the most effective and reliable way for employers to know more about the applicants.