2020年10月24日托福考试写作预测题+解析

　　2020年10月24日托福考试写作预测题+解析，各位托福考生要重点关注啦！本文来源网络，仅供各位同学参考！如果你对于托福备考还存在一些疑问，可以戳客服在线咨询，我们会安排专业的老师为您详细的解答，并规划适合您的课程！

图片来源网络

　　At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus, such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some universities, experts are hired to make these decisions, students almost never involved. Which approach do you prefer and why.

　　解析：

　　这是2017年5月20日考过的真题。这是教育类的二选一题目，和学生的校园生活比较贴近。很多同学选择第一个选项，即学生来参与校园事务。第二个选项，即由专家来做决定，其实也是可选的，只是由于部分同学不了解专家觉得没有什么内容可以展开。那今天这篇作文以选择专家的立场来作答。

　　需要注意的是，这道题目限定的场景是university，即大学校园，是需要在作文中扣住的。限定的话题是issues that affect daily life of every one campus并且给了一定的例子，题目中的这些例子是可以在作文中直接使用的。

　　本文立场：

　　Experts are hired to make these decisions, students almost never involved.

　　本文结构：

　　P1：Introduction

　　P2：A+

　　P3：B-

　　P4：Conclusion

　　参考理由：

　　1 专家有相关经验，因而做出的决定更加专业及客观。

　　2 学生忙于学业，没有时间调研因而做出的决定较为草率。

　　参考表达：

　　take part in 参与某事

　　thanks to 归功于

　　carry out a plan 实行计划

　　come up with a choice/ an idea 想出一个方法

　　tackle issues 解决问题

　　Nowadays, whether to let students make decisions about their daily life on campus is a hot-debated topic. Some people believe it is important to let students take part in, while others argue experts should be hired to make these decisions. As far as I am concerned, I am inclined to choose the latter.

　　To begin with, experts can give more objective and professional opinions because of their rich experience. They are called experts because they have studied the field profoundly. In other words, experts know how to make decisions about the daily life of students on campus such as the opening time of the library. Thanks to the relevant experience, they understand the needs of most students, so the best plan is carried out when it comes to when is the most appropriate time to open the library, how often students go to find a book on average, and how long they will stay in it. Instead, students come up with a choice based on their own judgments without considering others. Most old teenagers aged around twenty are not capable of planning their lives well, let alone tackling these issues. For instance, if they have two classes in the morning and only one in the afternoon, they will definitely choose to open the library in the afternoon. This is because they only have time to study in the library in the afternoon due to the busy schedule in the morning. However, the majority of their schoolmates may be willing to borrow a novel or review their math lessons at 8 o’clock in the morning in the library. Thus, the young adults responsible for the opening hours are not considering anyone else.

　　In addition, unlike experts, students do not have enough time to observe and make decisions. Normally, students spend most of their time studying rather than making decisions. If the university asks students to decide, they may choose randomly without thinking about it. For instance, when my sister Kate was in Sichuan university, once her class were asked to decide the restaurant menu for the following week. It was a week before the final exam, and everyone was preparing for it, reviewing the wrong questions, summarizing notes and discussing quizzes. Since no one wanted to waste the limited review time, my sister searched a menu on the internet randomly and sent it to the restaurant online, which only took her 2 minutes. Conversely, it is possible for experts to observe and study for days or even weeks before making decisions.

　　From what has been discussed above, we can strongly draw the conclusion that hiring experts to make decisions about issues that affect the daily life of everyone on campus is better than letting students make decisions.