11.28雅思考试​写作部分机经及解析来啦，供参考！

　　11.28雅思考试​写作部分机经及解析来啦，各位参加了此次考试的小伙伴，赶紧参考一下！如果你需要更详细的完整版11月28日雅思机经，戳客服即可在线领取，更多雅思备考请持续关注环球教育！

　　写作部分

　　小作文

　　类型：线形图+表格

　　欧洲一个国家六年里人均每周工作时间变化，六年的人均假期

图片来源网络

　　大作文

　　题目：Some people think governments should ban dangerous sports. Others, however, say people have the freedom to make their own decisions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.Write at least 250 words.

　　机经版本：20140809（本月第二次2014年老题）

　　题目类型：体育，双边讨论类

　　提纲：

　　禁止：1. 影响其他人；2. 受伤 - 个人和社会都损失；3. 公共资源浪费；

　　自由选择：1. 个人权利被侵犯；2. 多数人可以保护自己；3.禁令传递错误理念（政府来负责个人安全）；4.经济受影响。

　　范文（7分）

　　We are thrilled when watching dangerous sports shows like motor racing, boxing, rugby and many other stunts, such as seemingly elegant sports event, gymnastics, which is very dangerous, too. Although I am certainly concerned about the safety of those sports heroes, I think it is irrational to protect them by depriving them of their participation. The arguments for prohibition are grounded on the fundamental belief that we are not only individuals, but a part of the whole society and what we do can influence the others around. To be specific, high exposure to dangerous activities means there is a high possibility for participants to get injured. Once any injury occurs, even if not a fatal one, the participants themselves may lose the ability to work, therefore making no contribution to their community. Other than that, they would have to consume the public medical resources, which may be interpreted unfair to the other taxpayers who are committed their duty routinely. However, banning a sports event means a denial of personal rights of choice. We own our body and therefore we have every right to decide how to do with it, including doing dangerous physical activities. In addition, adults are mature enough to make reasonable judgment and take protective measures to ensure their life safety and this maturity deserves full respect. However, prohibition would send a wrong message that it is the government instead of the involved person who should be responsible for the health and safety of individuals. Another loss of forbidding perilous sports would be the economic one. Some high risk sports have developed into industries of millions of dollars, and eliminating them would cause huge economic losses. To conclude, I think there is no need for the government to intervene in sports including hazardous ones. Instead, it should set up professional and amateur standards of access, enforcing specialized training and protection outfits so as to reduce the chance of accidents.