x

雅思真题:没有必要参加现场表演话题的高分范文分享!

2020-03-23 14:29:07编辑:小羊

  2020年3月21日亚太雅思考试已经结束,前面我们已经分享了本次试题的写作思路分析,下面为大家分享高分范文,烤鸭们收藏:

  高分写作示范

  I would argue in this essay that the premise given in the prompt is certainly too subjective, and it therefore makes no sense about the result elicited.

雅思真题:没有必要参加现场表演话题的高分范文分享!
图片来源于网络

  There is no such a rule to judge whether watching a performance through television is “better” or not; subjectivity prevails this claim, since one can never define a parameter to make the system of differentiation, but this has to be the very first step once an appraisal happens. Just how can we guarantee that one activity is always better than another? I am not reluctant to agree with the people holding that the scenarios that are presented on the television would seem closer and more diverse than those viewed by the audience who have came to the live show; after all, the video makers have the privilege to stand wherever they want to ensure the most impressive shots. However, whether the immersion of the entire show can be sensed as that truly and greatly by viewers sitting on the couch as by those who are physically put into the environment to experience the full range of the performance is hard to tell, and the former is thus impossible to be deemed “better” than the latter. The set of criteria in the judgement of a “better” experience is also ambiguous enough without the ability to discern the varying degrees of visual or audio effects provided in the two modes, which can be totally different in terms of situations like the surroundings, the type of performances and the related producers, etc. Even if there is a scheme in place, the values assigned are still arbitrary.

  The same mindset can be also involved in thinking whether there is need to attend the live performance, since if not assessed in varying situations, a set of personal purposes if you will, any explicit conclusion would always be too absolute to be trustful. Whether one needs to go directly to the scene of a live performance is certainly not only decided by the single reason of whether television broadcasts are better (let alone the uncertainty of the evaluation), but the subjective consideration held by people themselves, or sometimes, the performance per se. Who is to say that it is to no avail for the audience to express their worship or admiration to the singers or actors by showing up in the gigs or theatres? And that sizable audiences are not necessary to the performers by giving out positive feedbacks to arise their passions and stage performances? The myopic thinking exhibited by the topic certainly distracts us from thinking the necessity of this personal activity and the causal relationship in a rational way, from being objective and from seeing the cruxes that are lying behind the controversy.

  In conclusion, it is the absurdity of certain utterances in the topic that compel me to question the reasonableness in the notion and I truly veto that the television broadcasts of the shows truly dwarf the related live performances and that the presence of audience is truly unnecessary.

  相关词汇和语法结构

  Prompt 题干

  Parameter 评价标准

  Appraisal 评估