雅思大作文城市中的高楼与矮楼写作思路及范文分析

2020-01-17 10:31:46编辑：景景

　　双边讨论类大作文社会类话题雅思大作文城市中的高楼与矮楼写作思路及范文分析遇到这样的话题，你会怎么定义写作主推呢？你认为该从哪方面着手写作呢？本文小编为大家提供写作思路及范文等，希望能给大家提供参考价值！

　　Some people think “vertical city” is the best, where people live and work in tall buildings. Others think “horizontal city” is better, where there are few tall buildings. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　(题目来源：2014年12月6日)

　　一、题目大意

　　一些人认为垂直城市是最好的，在这种城市中人们在高楼中居住和工作，另一些人认为水平城市更好，在这种城市中几乎没有高楼。讨论双方观点并给与你个人观点。

　　二、思路分析

　　两方都缺乏完整的合理性，而更好的方式是两种城市的结合：

　　1.认为垂直城市是最好的人看到的是城市发展的趋势迫使，但却忽略了水平型建筑在城市中的作用：之所以有这种思想是因为这些人考虑到一个城市的良性发展规模——必然会产业多样，并必然会有更多的人口涌入——住房和便利性等一些列问题——VC成为一种不得不做的选择。然而，城市中的文化是构建城市特性的重要部分，没有HC，这部分文化会丧失掉，城市会变得没有特征。

　　2.认为水平城市更优越的人们看到的是这种城市建筑体系在某些特定方面的居住舒适性，但忽略了宏观角度城市的整体发展方向：水平城市的舒适度体现在：个人空间性更强，不容易收到更多邻居的打扰，更加容易协调和安排的社群，以及不会收到遮挡的不平衡的视野。但只有水平城市建筑无法适应现在城市的整体发展方向，并且融合高层建筑才能够让城市在居住舒适性和城市容量方面得到有效平衡。

　　三、关键词

　　Best 论述第一方合理性时不要只关注于优点而是为什么这种方式是最优选择。

　　四、提纲

　　五、高分范文

　　I would discuss the both thoughts that myopically separate the urban constructing modes totally from one another; cities work more effectively when combining the vertical buildings and the horizontal ones together.

　　Many may consider vertical city as the prior choice for planners to set up their city mode, but flaws may be witnessed when without the coordination of horizontal ones. The reason why they lean their views on this may be the thinking of the current situation or the future development of most regular cities. Once wanting to become, or should I say harboring the potential of becoming a metropolis, those urban places should have the capacities facing the problems emerged alongside the booming: a flowing and expanding population, an increasing prosperous industrial scale, the proliferating use of transport and a perfect balance between the modernization and the identity belonging to the city per se. Therefore, urges may be manifest for owning a multi-functional construction property to fulfill the need for convenience and for integrating more people in a limited place; high-rise buildings or the skyscrapers has to be the option under this circumstance. Whereas there are also demands for maintaining something unique for those cities; it is always necessary to preserve the cultural identities, most of which are reflected in the constructions inherited from history, and are largely “horizontal buildings”. That means, a city combined with both skyscrapers and low-layered ones may not only imply to build the both, but to mainly focus on building vertical ones together with the conservation of ancient, classic horizontal structures—that is, to never forget to maintain the own characteristic of the metropolis, for its life power in the long-term paths, because the identity is the only thing distinguishing a city from others, and avoiding it from being sunk in the overwhelming urbanization.

　　Recklessness, however, would also be manifest when others superficially claim that living in an urban area with few high-rise buildings would be with more outweighing benefits. They certainly narrow their mind just on the individual living experience but not from a rational, macro perspective. Clearly, living in a region with few tall buildings is more comfortable and secured than the life in only tall structures: after all, people gain more privacy when there are not too many people sharing a wall; they are less interrupted by neighborhood when dwellers are not too integrated inside a limited living space; a smaller residential group is also more easily arranged and coordinated; even the visual field outside the window would be more balanced than the high-rise buildings, which would themselves block views from different areas, and in which visions in different layers totally vary. Whereas all the aforementioned edges of living in a horizontal city would be firstly realized by the capacity of a city in accommodating its dwellers without too many barriers; housing problems would otherwise overwhelm the living conditions inside the city, and it then becomes less efficient since one can hardly find enough horizontal spaces to fulfill the need for housing. A combination with vertical construction would be obliged for city planners to balance the living comfortability by the horizontal buildings and the capability and functions provided by the high-rising ones—multiple instances and data points have also proved the mix is most frequently adapted by metropolis worldwide.

　　In conclusion, I would very much agree that any isolated constructing mode is not suitable enough for most current urbanization; effectiveness is manifest for combining the both constructing modes.

　　相关词汇

　　Myopically 天真地

　　Flaw 瑕疵

　　Lean 倾斜

　　Metropolis 大都市

　　Inherit 继承

　　Skyscraper 摩天大楼

　　Recklessness 鲁莽

　　Superficially 表面地

　　Dweller 居住者

　　Coordinate 协调

　　Aforementioned 上述的