2021年9月18日托福写作【综合写作】回忆和解析含范文！
2021年9月18日托福写作回忆和解析含范文！环球教育南京学校李敏老师提供整理！这次托福考试写作部分整体难度适中。综合重复了2020年12月20日的老题；独立重复了2019年10月12日、2020年11月1日考试以及2021年1月 和3月家考的原题。
综合写作考查历史考古类，整体难度适中，结构清晰。
独立写作考查新闻类话题，比较抽象，较有难度，但因为是老题，学生可能提前准备。
综合写作
话题分类综合写作考查历史考古类，重复 2020/12/20考题
考题回忆总论点巨石阵Stonehenge的石头是如何搬运的
阅读部分1. 用船运输
2. platform-and-roll system
3. 被冰川带往当地
听力部分（反驳）
1. 石头很难通过船运运送到当地，从山上取石头再运到海里，这个操作难度非常大
2. 单颗石头重量已经十分惊人，无法通过wooden roll运送
3. 冰川里面的石头和巨石阵石头来源不同
解题思路按照总分结构，做好阅读部分的总结并展现出听力对应阅读提出的反驳。
范文:
The materials mainly discuss how the huge stones were transported to the Stonehenge site in England. While the author presents three theories about the modes of transportation, the professor believes that all of the assumptions in the reading are not convincing.
Firstly, the author speculates that boats were used to carry the stones to the site. However, the professor considers this speculation to be short of cogency because it was drastically difficult to drag the stones to the boats in the ocean from the mountains, let alone shipping the huge-sized stones an enormous distance from Wales to the vast Sablisbury plains in England.
Secondly, the writer proposes a platform-and-roll system for the stone shipment. In fact, according to the professor, each stone is excessively heavy, and could not be pulled successfully by the wood rolls then. Moreover, the sledges did not work well for climbing the mountain slopes. Therefore, the second inference in the reading passage is also rendered incredible by the professor.
Finally, the author reckons that the giant stones travelled to the Stonehenge site by glaciers. This is also rebutted by the professor who claims that no evidence could be given to support this statement in the reading. In fact, the stones found in glaciers originate from mountains which are different from those offering stones for Stonehenge. Hence, the third argument in the reading is still overturne
The materials mainly discuss how the huge stones were transported to the Stonehenge site in England. While the author presents three theories about the modes of transportation, the professor believes that all of the assumptions in the reading are not convincing.
Firstly, the author speculates that boats were used to carry the stones to the site. However, the professor considers this speculation to be short of cogency because it was drastically difficult to drag the stones to the boats in the ocean from the mountains, let alone shipping the huge-sized stones an enormous distance from Wales to the vast Sablisbury plains in England.
Secondly, the writer proposes a platform-and-roll system for the stone shipment. In fact, according to the professor, each stone is excessively heavy, and could not be pulled successfully by the wood rolls then. Moreover, the sledges did not work well for climbing the mountain slopes. Therefore, the second inference in the reading passage is also rendered incredible by the professor.
Finally, the author reckons that the giant stones travelled to the Stonehenge site by glaciers. This is also rebutted by the professor who claims that no evidence could be given to support this statement in the reading. In fact, the stones found in glaciers originate from mountains which are different from those offering stones for Stonehenge. Hence, the third argument in the reading is still overturned.
The materials mainly discuss how the huge stones were transported to the Stonehenge site in England. While the author presents three theories about the modes of transportation, the professor believes that all of the assumptions in the reading are not convincing.
Firstly, the author speculates that boats were used to carry the stones to the site. However, the professor considers this speculation to be short of cogency because it was drastically difficult to drag the stones to the boats in the ocean from the mountains, let alone shipping the huge-sized stones an enormous distance from Wales to the vast Sablisbury plains in England.
Secondly, the writer proposes a platform-and-roll system for the stone shipment. In fact, according to the professor, each stone is excessively heavy, and could not be pulled successfully by the wood rolls then. Moreover, the sledges did not work well for climbing the mountain slopes. Therefore, the second inference in the reading passage is also rendered incredible by the professor.
Finally, the author reckons that the giant stones travelled to the Stonehenge site by glaciers. This is also rebutted by the professor who claims that no evidence could be given to support this statement in the reading. In fact, the stones found in glaciers originate from mountains which are different from those offering stones for Stonehenge. Hence, the third argument in the reading is still overturned.
更多备考干货，请关注环球教育！在线即可预约雅思托福免费试听课
